Header graphic for print
Delaware Bankruptcy Litigation Information on Corporate Bankruptcy Proceedings in Delaware and Throughout the United States

Category Archives: Opinions

Subscribe to Opinions RSS Feed

Analysis Regarding Third-Party Releases in Bankruptcy

Posted in Opinions

In the recent decision of In re Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd., the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York approved certain non-consensual third-party releases granted by unimpaired creditors and equity holders, to the extent that they complied with the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s standard for approval of these… Continue Reading

Third Circuit Rules that Failure to Disclose Third-Party Release Proves Fatal

Posted in Opinions, Recent Developments in Bankruptcy Law

In the recent Third Circuit decision of In re Lower Bucks Hospital, No. 13-1311 (3d Cir. July 3, 2014), the Third Circuit upheld the ruling of the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that non-consensual releases were not part of the debtor’s plan of reorganization due to failure to adequately disclose the same to… Continue Reading

Majestic Holdco Opinion Discusses Excusable Neglect

Posted in Opinions

Summary In an 8 page decision signed February 21, 2013, Judge Gross of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court denied a Motion for Enlargement of Administrative Claim, holding that the movant failed to prove excusable neglect. Judge Gross’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”). The Opinion analyzes the motion pursuant to the excusable neglect factors provided in… Continue Reading

Court Applies Divestiture Rule in New Century Bankruptcy Proceeding

Posted in Opinions

Earlier this summer, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court issued an opinion in the New Century Holdings bankruptcy addressing the definition and purpose of the "Divestiture Rule."  See Carr v. New Century TRS Holdings, Inc. (In re New Century TRS Holdings, Inc.), Adv. No. 09-52251(KJC)(Bankr. D. Del. June 7, 2012)(hereinafter "Opinion at *___").  Under the Divestiture Rule, an appeal… Continue Reading

Decision in Ultimate Acquisition Grants Motion to Dismiss, But Also Grants Leave to Amend the Preference Complaint

Posted in Opinions

Summary In a straight-forward 9 page decision signed May 1, 2012, Judge Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a preference complaint, but granted the plaintiff leave to amend. Judge Walrath’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).  Numerous posts on this blog discuss other opinions issued by the Delaware Bankruptcy… Continue Reading

Ruling Confirms that Judicial Liens are Dischargeable in Chapter 7

Posted in Opinions

Summary In an opinion issued March 16, 2012, Judge Sontchi of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court ruled that unpaid debts subject to a judicial lien are dischargeable in bankruptcy. Judge Sontchi’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).  The Opinion, like all those published by Judge Sontchi, walks readers through the relevant law in making its final ruling;… Continue Reading

Consistency – A Hallmark of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court

Posted in Opinions

In a 17 page decision entered March 9, 2012, Judge Carey of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court granted a motion for relief from the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay to allow an undersecured creditor to exercise its remedies against a debtor’s collateral.  A copy of Judge Carey’s opinion is available here (the "Opinion").  The Opinion was issued… Continue Reading

Opinion Issued in Carolina Fluid Handling

Posted in Opinions

On March 14, 2012, Judge Sontchi of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court issued an opinion in the Carolina Fluid Handling Intermediate Holding Corp. bankruptcy case.  When a Fox Rothschild client is (or could be) affected by a ruling, rather than summarize the opinion, I will be providing a link to the opinion.  The opinion is available… Continue Reading

Decision in AE Liquidation, Inc. Allows Preference Complaint to be Amended After the Expiration of the Statute of Limitations

Posted in Opinions

Summary In an 8 page decision signed January 6, 2012, Judge Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court allowed a plaintiff to amend a preference complaint to include additional transfers, even though the statute of limitations had expired. Judge Walrath’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).  Numerous posts on this blog discuss other opinions issued by… Continue Reading

Decision in Sierra Concrete Design, Inc. Provides a Thorough Explanation of the Principles Behind Bankruptcy’s Preference Laws

Posted in Opinions

Summary In an opinion issued January 4, 2012, Judge Sontchi of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court provided an easy to follow primer in preference law in the course of granting in part and denying in part a preference defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Judge Sontchi’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).  The Opinion provides an excellent… Continue Reading

Decision in Visteon Walks Through Analysis of Improper Venue and Venue Transfer Decisions

Posted in Opinions

Summary In a very easy to follow opinion issued October 21, 2011, Judge Sontchi of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court denied a motion to dismiss an avoidance action for improper venue or, in the alternative, to transfer venue of the action. Judge Sontchi’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”). The Opinion provides an excellent framework for… Continue Reading

Stern v. Marshall: Effects on Delaware

Posted in Opinions

On June 23, 2011, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that has sent waves through bankruptcy courts across the nation. Stern v. Marshall, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (2011), is the latest opinion in a long running dispute between the estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall, better known as Anna Nicole Smith, and the estate of her late husband’s… Continue Reading

Decision in Everything But Water, LLC Requires Preference Claimants to Identify Transferees Specifically in Granting Motion to Dismiss

Posted in Opinions

Summary In an 11 page decision signed June 30, 2011, Judge Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court granted a motion to dismiss, holding that a preference complaint must clearly identify the alleged preference transferee. Judge Walrath’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).  A number of decisions on motions to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil… Continue Reading

SemCrude Decision Delineates the Process for Analyzing Motions for Continuance vs. Motions for Summary Judgment

Posted in Opinions

Summary In an 24 page decision signed June 20, 2011, Judge Shannon of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court partially granted several parties’ motions for a continuance opposing several motions for summary judgment, holding that a motion for continuance must be analyzed before even considering a motion for summary judgment. Judge Shannon’s opinion is available here (the… Continue Reading

Fruehauf Opinion Illustrates that Despite a Preference to Allow Amendment of Pleadings, Courts Won’t Always Allow Amendment

Posted in Opinions

Summary In a 23 page decision signed July 15, 2011, Judge Walsh of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court denied a motion to allow a plaintiff to file an amended complaint, holding that the amended complaint was too deficient to survive a motion to dismiss and therefore would not be allowed. Judge Walsh’s opinion is available here… Continue Reading

Decision in Friedmans’s Reviews Delaware Precedent on Recharacterization

Posted in Opinions

Summary In his first published opinion since returning from a well-deserved vacation, Judge Sontchi of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court ruled that facially plausible allegations are sufficient to protect a complaint, which sought to recharacterize another party’s bankruptcy claims, from being dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 12(b)(6). Judge Sontchi’s opinion is available… Continue Reading